Sunday, September 20, 2009

Passive Index Funds Beat Active Funds Debate

From NYT and Standard and Poor's:


  • "Over the five years ended June 30, only 37.1 percent of actively managed funds made up of large-capitalization stocks beat the category’s benchmark, the S.&P. 500. Most large-cap investors would have done better with a plain old S.&P. 500 index fund. "
  • "Only 26.6 percent of managed mid-cap funds beat their index, the S.&P. 400, while 42.6 percent of managed small-cap funds beat the S.&P. 600."

  • "S.&P.’s look at funds containing foreign stocks covered four very broad categories, and generally showed that only a small minority of managed funds beat the benchmarks."
  • "The study, which looked at 3,500 managed funds, reinforces the findings of many past studies by the S.&P., other firms and academics. Over time, the average active manager simply cannot pick enough market-beating stocks to offset the high cost of running the fund. Most indexers carry expense ratios of less than 0.2 percent, while most managed stock funds charge more than 1 percent, five times as much. Indexers’ smaller fees leave more money in the account to compound, making a big difference over the years."

But the actively managed multi billion dollar industry disputes these findings:

  • "Lending some support to their view, S.&P. noted that on an “asset-weighted” basis, managed funds matched or beat their benchmarks in “most categories except mid-caps and emerging markets.”

The author also questions if the average investor actually gets these returns and if the added risk is worth it:

  • "Marketing on the basis of recent performance can be a dirty trick, drawing investors in too late to share in the big gains."
  • "The average investor therefore does much worse than the investor who buys a block of shares and hangs on through thick and thin."
  • "If your long-term plan calls for annual stock returns averaging 7 percent, and you think you can get that with a low-fee S.&P. 500 indexer, is it really worth a lot of trouble to shuffle your money among a sequence of managed funds you expect to return 7.5 or 8 percent."

Learn more:

http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPIVA_2009_Midyear.pdf

http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/active-vs-passive-the-debate-keeps-going/?ref=your-money

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Types of business structures

From CNN Money, learn about the types of business tax structures
and the similarities and differences between them:

LLP, LLC, S-corp, C-corp, GP and LP

http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/30/smallbusiness/business_structures_101.fsb/index.htm
We do not assume liability or responsibility for any losses that may derive from or allege to derive from, directly or indirectly, by use of information on this site or the information contained on the linked websites. The information on this site and linked sites are used for informational purposes only and are not meant to be a substitute for professional advice.


© 2008 Michael Hepner Hani Sarji The Personal Finance Lifeline Blog